如何处理SCI审稿人意见？
当回复不是单纯拒稿时，大部分都会再加上审稿意见希望作者澄清与内文修正。审稿意见来自期刊编辑与评审，一般正面的审稿意见有两种形式:1.期刊对你的论文感到兴趣，而且评审希望你做些增删来优化论文，收到这样的信就代表你已经离发表不远了。2.你可能收到一封拒稿的信但里面却写着期刊会重新审核论文如果论文有重新做实质上的修改，包括增加新的数据。
用棒球来做比喻的话，就是成功击出并上了一垒但还不能上二垒，这时候你可以修改你的论文并进行追加实验来满足期刊要求。不论你前面的表现如何，期刊接受率都会根据你如何回覆这些评审意见来决定。 当你回信时，要谨记几点：以下是几个可以帮助你在回信时解说你如何修改论文的句型开头Thank you for providing these insights.Thank you for your suggestion.That is an interesting query.This is an interesting perspective.We agree with you.We agree with your assessment.You have raised an important question.You have asked an interesting question.同意审稿或期刊编辑意见We agree with you and have incorporated this suggestion throughout our paper.We have reflected this comment by… (p. #, lines #-#).We have incorporated your comments by… (p. #, lines #-#).We agree that…We have now [X] (p. #, lines #-#) and [Y] (p. #, lines #-#). We think these changes now better [Z]. We hope that you agree.不同意评审或期刊编辑意见You have raised an important point; however, we believe that [X] would be outside the scope of our paper because…This is a valid assessment of…; however, we believe that [X] would be more appropriate because…We agree that…; however, due to [X], we believe that…In our revisions, we have attempted to [X] (p. #, lines #-#); however, we have retained some of our arguments because…We acknowledge that [X] has certain limitations; however,…解释澄清We have clarified that… means… (p. #, lines #-#) throughout the paper.We have redrafted the [X] section (p. #, lines #-#) to establish a clearer focus.We have revised the text (p. #, lines #-#) to reflect…We removed [X] (from p. #, lines #-#) and hope that the deletion clarifies the points we attempted to make.We have replaced the term [X] throughout the paper with [Y] to use more precise terms.We have rewritten [X] (p. #, lines #-#) to be more in line with your comments. We hope that the edited section clarifies…We have elaborated on [X] (p. #, lines #-#) and expanded our consideration of [Y]. We hope these revisions provide a more [balanced][thorough] discussion.额外的信息与解释We have included a new Figure # (p. #) to further illustrate…We have added a new Table # (p. #), which outlines…We have supplemented the [X] section with explanations of [Y] (p. #, lines #-#).There are multiple reasons/approaches to…, including [our scenario]. We have included an acknowledgment regarding this point in the [X] section (p. #, lines #-#).We have not done… However, we believe that [doing X] (p. #, lines #-#) would address this issue because…We have not done…; however, our sense is that…回答多题 (当你的一个回复回答许多问题时)Please see point # above. [e.g., "Please see point 2(a) above."] 。
SCI论文被拒稿之后，该怎样处理呢？
SCI论文能够一投就中的，实在万中无一。因此，投SCI论文被拒稿，乃是常有之事，不必惊慌，不必焦虑，更不必为此悲伤。有的时候，SCI论文投稿有点玄乎，也许需要集齐天时、地利、人和才能得以发表。当然，这只是吐槽一下投稿过程的曲折和艰辛而已。曾经有一位教授说过，论文写作不难，真正难的在于论文投稿与发表——前辈诚不我欺也。
下面以我去年发表的一篇文章为例，为你解答SCI论文被拒稿之后，该怎样处理的问题。这篇文章属于储能材料方向，导师一开始想冲冲 Nature Communications，于是我把论文的格式按照 Nature Communications 的模板去弄好了，在2月13日把材料都上传到了 Nature Communications 的投稿系统，但是因为那天是周四，临近周末，便没有点击递交，等了2月18日，也就是下一个周二投了过去。
2月24日被NC拒稿，编辑建议转投Nature 旗下的 Communication 系列2019年的新出期刊 Communications Materials。没有转投。跟导师商量之后，决定试试 Wiley 旗下的 Advanced Materials。花了一天多时间改好格式后，2月26日把文章投递到了 Advanced Materials。
10天之后收到编辑来信，表示 Advanced Materials 不接收这篇稿件，建议转投到新刊 Energy Technology 或 Small Methods。Energy Technology 不太看好，Small Methods 文章质量比较高，但还是没有转投 （如果转投的话编辑承诺会送审，中的几率比较大）。
接下来还是改格式，思虑再三，3月11日投了 RSC 旗下的 Energy
文章TAG：elaborated
